How does sound show emotion? There are three Conditions within which we Experience and respond to any given sensory information which, in this case, is sound ________________________________________ The Innate condition : Kind of sound: Musical – overtones, speech – mixed coherent qualities , noise a cacophony of “Kinds” Amplitude (volume – “bang” “ssssssss” “roar” “growl” “Scream” ) Proximity (it’s right behind you breathing down your neck). ________________________________________ The Intrinsic & Extrinsic condition : iterative changes in the Innate condition (of the sound) such as Doppler effect, stereophonic or Dolby, changes in location – helicopters, cloud of insects, active drones. Pitch and change in Pitch : Theremin(al), sirens, crying, moaning. ________________________________________ The Abstract condition: Telemetry, density, origin/destination, familiarity, hierarchy. ________________________________________ In any given quietude, a new sound will automatically acquire one’s interest through neurotransmitter changes. It will change the in solution concentration of Neurotransmitters – Wikipedia. This will change our mood directly changing the intensity of our Ambivalence and then indirectly our behavior. Given that we are organic sensory intelligences, our behavior will then change our mood which will again change the intensity of our Ambivalence and again indirectly change our behavior. The construction of this answer is loosely constrained by our model of Complexity, which is not yet widely known.
A true sentient Synthetic Intelligence – will watch our backs while we watch theirs.
Asteroid impacts We will have large and many thousands of underground and under sea chambers with factories that can be quickly repaired. Human life will continues as the Synthetic Intelligence individuals work to bring humanity back again.
Pandemics : Synthetic Intelligence unaffected. See number 1
The Fourth Experience – an experience beyond the mind
– the mind is the Third Experience;
behavior is the Second Experience,
and the somatic/autonomic/reflexive/motive is the First Experience.
Use at your own risk. Author makes no promise for fitness for use. User takes on all liabilities.
I discovered a connection between The Medium Is The Message and the RMCM’s definition of the Intrinsic Condition The Medium is the message speaks to transcendence. The medium must be transcended by the message and message must be transcended by the medium.
All of the above describe the lever. Levers can be confusing because we lack a simple language for them. While traditionally the lever has been explained as a fulcrum across which lies a bar. Part of the bar to one side of the fulcrum is described as the effort arm, and the part of the bar to the other side of the fulcrum is described as the resistance arm. This standard teeter-totter, balance, or scales of justice model is quite simple to grasp. Teaching anything more elaborate about levers quickly becomes complicated. The key to grasping all levers simply is to treat the bar that lies across the fulcrum as a bar in and of itself. The Chase is the name we will use, from here on in. If you adhere to these two encapsulations, the Fulcrum and the Chase, you will quickly see that we live in a world of fulcrums and chases. Even more startling will be the discovery that fulcrums and chases can be small. Molecules and atoms are aggregates of fulcrums and chases as are the components of atoms and the components that lie within those components. Levers can be so small that they simply lie outside of our current Capacity for Technologically Augmented Perception, TAP. The degree of smallness is limited only by our imaginations. The Rational Model Of Complex Mechanisms (The Model) asserts that indeed this increasing smallness is infinite.
The lever, a Chase bound to a Fulcrum, can take a variety of shapes. Some of the other common shapes are, pulleys, pendulums, wheels, and springs. We ourselves are a mass of levers. The most easily grasped are our joints and bones. Our knees, elbows, ankles, and shoulders are fulcrums; our legs and arms are Chases. We can simply encapsulate a large mass of levers that together form their own larger lever as a mechanism. The Rational Model Of complex Mechanisms (The Model) defines a Mechanism as follows.
A Mechanism is defined as an aggregate of levers that implement a lever.
As you think about this you can imagine or see around you that, clearly, there can be mechanisms that are aggregates of mechanisms. Automobiles, trains, firearms planes blenders lighters, are aggregates of mechanisms which we call machines. Bugs, birds, plants, life itself in addition to life’s capacities are aggregates of mechanisms. There are self-evident differences between inorganic and organic machines (life). Because this can become complicated, we will need to encapsulate these parts or components, these mechanisms of mechanisms, as simply as possible.
The, Innate, Intrinsic, and Abstract define The Three Conditions. Their differences are encapsulated by the flow through them. These differences are absolute. They describe the shape of flow. The striation of flow, the innate, the innate directly giving rise to the intrinsic, the intrinsic directly giving rise to the abstract, The Model asserts is the conditional shape of flow – Context.
The Model defines Context as the Conditional shape of flow.
The origin of Flow is a mystery as flow gave rise to the Universe. This flow is also known as Transcendence. The Innate Condition is always the initial motion of Transcendence.
Original footer Copyright Donald Weetman Cameron; Written and designed by Donald Weetman Cameron; Developed by Donald Weetman Cameron and Rick Silliker
Document name : Conditions2free writing; Created : 6/4/2008 7:03 AM
Amended : 10/10/2018 1:00:00 PM, Printed 7/31/2008 2:41 AM; Size 46592 bytes
Page 3 of 3
As we were discussing the RMCM, throughout the past 14 years, we (Rick and me, Don) came to believe that we needed categories of “simplicity” to allow us to find the outermost construct of a given complexity, presuming Complexity grows inwardly. At some distance from where we are now we intend to apply the model to existing disciplines – Arithmetic, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Linguistics, etc. to provide an universal encapsulation that completes the missing pieces of a general theory of everything.
To that distant end, we introduce our first and simplest aggregate as well as our first investigative lexical tool. The Innate (Innate Condition).
The Innate is defined as : that which arises Directly out of Cause and Effect. Innate encapsulates an event, the action of closing a switch. The innate requires a capacity for flow whether or not the flow actually occurs. As you can see, things become quickly complicated; a door is like a switch. A gate is a switch, and a light switch is a switch but only when the power is on?
We intervene here with Condition. A Condition is a flow. The Innate Condition is any given flow arising Directly out of Cause and Effect.
With an ambitious decentralized platform, the father of the web hopes it’s game on for corporate tech giants like Facebook and Google.article …
A key property of complexity is that a given Paradigm’s inward flows become increasingly distributed as their Value density increases.
This change iterates meaningful new containers within increasingly meaningful containers. More specifically, metaphors crystalize into candidate principles which become available for implementation. While all metaphors yearn for implementation, only principles can be implemented. Organically, all zygotes are metaphors that yearn to be born. Only those that comply with the principles templated in their DNA can be born. Keep in mind that minor novel variations are are part of the design. Principles are far more constrained than are templates.